Sunday, October 26, 2008


Seeds for Liberalism?

"Mr. Obama, an Inexperienced Charismatic Politician who Says He will Give the Country Change and a Bright New Future.

In the Aftermath of World War II everyone was wondering, how did people lose their freedom? How could they let a group of people of extremists take power? Quoting Martin Niemöller's famous poem in which he remembers how fragile our liberty is,

"The Nazi's came for the communists and since he wasn't one, he did nothing. Then they came for the trade unionists, and he wasn't one, so he did nothing. Then they came for the Jews and the Catholics and he again did nothing. Then, when they finally came for him, there was no one left to defend him."

NOW, comes slanted coverage by the media and censorship by outlets like DIRECT TV and DISH Network which refuse to run our DEAR MR. OBAMA ad. Further, newspapers that are running our ad and McCain supporters are being attacked.

Niemöller's chilling words ring true about how fragile our liberty is. All it takes is a charismatic speaker to woo the masses into believing that progress and change reside with him and that he will take this nation into a bright new future. Sound familiar?

Well, it should, and this is only the start. If you think Mr. Obama and the lunatic liberal fringe wouldn't go there, they will and already are!

Today You Still Have Free Speech - Tomorrow You May be Persecuted.

Here are just two examples of the loss of liberty happening in the U.S today.

The Paper: a local newspaper in California felt the wrath of open minded Obama supporters when it ran the RMCPAC Full Page Ad.

If it can happen to us . . . it can happen to you . . . or your newspaper.

"There are some mighty powerful Barack Obama fans out there in North County CA .

It appears Steffani Cobler, Office Administrator at Kaiser Permanente, San Marcos , is one of them.

Ms. Cobler called The Paper last Thursday to advise that we would not be allowed to deliver our paper on the campus any longer. Up until that time we had been dropping 700 copies every week off for staff and patient's reading pleasure.

Why, we asked, would we now be banned from the San Marcos campus?"

"You ran an editorial that we did not agree with," she said. "You had a picture of Senator Obama and had derogatory things to say about him. Plus," she went on, "several of your jokes we found offensive. I and several of my colleagues found them offensive." She told us further, "Our Physician-Leader read your editorial critical of Obama and it upset him. He said he didn't want this paper here anymore."

At this point we explained to Ms. Cobler that:

The editorial she was referring to was not editorial at all. It was a paid political advertisement, placed and paid for by The Republican Majority Campaign and if she, or any Democrat wished to place a political advertisement supporting Senator Obama, we'd be happy to accept the order, accept their money, and allow them freedom of expression by placing their ad with us.

We asked Ms. Cobler the name of the "physician-leader" who was so upset about the paid political advertisement concerning Senator Obama. She refused to give us his or her name. We advised her we'd like to talk to him or her and make certain that he or she understood that this was a political advertisement but had it not been, if it had been an editorial statement by The Paper, that this was something called freedom of speech, freedom of expression, freedom of the press, and it is covered by the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America as well as the California State Constitution. We would have pointed out that for him/her to order The Paper banned because he or she did not agree with the political statement was tantamount to him/her deciding what others could say, hear, or read . . . and this is a serious infringement of freedom of the press.

Ms. Cobler was unmoved.

We asked her which joke(s) offended her or her colleagues. She could not cite which particular joke offended her. We reaffirmed that she and her colleagues were trampling all over First Amendment rights . . banning something simply based on content that she, personally, or some unnamed doctor, was offended by. This unfairly put her and the alleged physician/leader in the position of deciding for the public what they may or may not read. That is clearly suppression of free speech.

Suppressing Freedom of Speech, or the attempt to do so, is not all that uncommon. For some strange reason, our freedom of speech seems to be drawing most attention from area hospitals. We’ve done three well documented and unchallenged expose’s on Mike Covert, the president and CEO of Palomar Pomerado Health District. As soon as our first expose broke, guess what happened? They sought to ban our papers from the hospital.

We still deliver The Paper to Palomar Medical Center. And they still try to throw most of our copies away. Some still get through to staff and patients.

More recently, Tri City Hospital tried to pass a bond issue for the third time. The San Diego Union Tribune and the North County Times endorsed the bond issue. We opposed it. It failed. For the third time.

Guess what happened? The very next day we were banned from distributing The Paper at Tri-City Hospital. We still deliver our papers to Tri-City Hospital. They may throw some of them away . . . but not many.

We’ve made our positions clearly known with both Palomar Pomerado Health and with Tri City Hospital: they are public hospitals. We have every right to distribute our papers at public hospitals under the First Amendment as guaranteed by both the Federal Constitution as well as the California Constitution.

We do know that what the San Marcos Kaiser facility has done is violative of the First Amendment by attempting to suppress free speech. Their ban of our papers is based on content and they acknowledge that. That is suppression of speech and by one or two people.

So Who Does Banning The Paper at Kaiser Hurt?

It hurts you, the reader.

You won’t have the chance to learn the results of investigative journalism we have undertaken to protect you, the consumer. You won’t get to read fascinating cover stories about adventure, travel, historical slices of time. You won’t get to read the handy information provided by our brilliant columnists.

Next time you go into the San Marcos Kaiser Clinic and notice there are no copies of The Paper, you may want to call Ms. Cobler and let her know how you feel. She can be readily reached at 760.510.4126.

Do not threaten us. We will publish what we feel and know to be the truth . . . or our opinion and those of others. And we will not allow, nor tolerate anyone to interfere with our right of freedom of the press. Nor with yours."

Read the rest of this account/commentary regarding the ensuing battle with Kaiser Permanente by going to:

Secret Service Sent By Obama Campaign Questions Mother of Three

Roger Hedgecock, former San Diego mayor and radio personality sheds some light on the beginning of the end of freedom as we know it. You MUST read this!

"Jessica Hughes of Lufkin , Texas , former Marine, mother of three, answered her cell phone in the car, coming home from the emergency room. Her 9-year-old had suffered a mild concussion, but was OK. The caller was a female Obama volunteer who asked if Jessica would support Obama for president. Jessica replied, "No, I don't support him. Your guy is a socialist who voted four times in the state Senate to let little babies die in hospital closets; I think you should find something better to do with your time." Then Jessica hung up. The next day, a man and a woman in suits showed up at the door of her home, identifying themselves as members of the Secret Service. The Secret Service agents stated that the Obama campaign had complained of a death threat. They had quoted Jessica as saying, "I will never support Obama, and he will wind up dead on a hospital floor." Jessica's husband had heard Jessica's side of the original phone call and verified the actual quote. To which the female agent replied, "Oh? Well why would she (the Obama volunteer) make that up?"

Jessica replied that the Obama volunteer was probably unhappy about what Jessica had said about her candidate. The female agent then said "That's right, you were rude!" The male agent then displayed a file with Jessica's full name prominently printed on it and asked her how she felt about Obama. At this point, the former Marine told the agent "in no uncertain terms" (as she later recounted) that this was America and that the last time she checked, she was allowed to think whatever she wanted without being questioned by the Secret Service. And was being "rude" a federal crime now too? The agents then admitted they had no tape of the conversation, just the quote from the Obama campaign. Responding to Jessica's questions, the agents would not identify themselves by name, nor reveal the name of the Obama volunteer who had made the complaint. The agents did indicate that Jessica was not in a court of law yet, and that they were trying to not embarrass her "by going to all her family and neighbors."

To these implied threats, Jessica invited the agents to speak to whomever they wanted, and stated she would happily go to court since she had done nothing wrong. Jessica asked the agents, "Look, someone calls me unsolicited on my cell phone to ask me to support their candidate, and I can't tell them why I don't?"

The Secret Service left Jessica that day, but she could not get the "visit" out of her mind."

If this doesn't get a fire burning in your chest, then nothing will! This is the beginning of the end for the freedoms we all know and love. First they will come for the freedom of speech! The liberals in congress are already trying to censor talk radio and shut down any who oppose their radical programs! Think about it, you can't even say what you want to anymore in this politically correct environment that THEY have created. They will use what is "proper" and "correct" to strip you of your right to free speech.

Next they will come for your guns! They will strip of the only way to defend your self in the name of "safety" and "order". Oddly enough, Mr. Obama was against the right to defend your home in the Washington , DC Heller case. The court ruling made it abundantly clear that laws which ban the possession of firearms, or make it simply impossible through regulation for citizens to exercise their right to keep and bear arms, are unconstitutional and cannot stand.

Could this ever happen? Could the charismatic speech of a "leader" pull the wool over your eyes and introduce the U.S. to a loss of liberty beyond our imagination? It can happen to you and as history repeats itself it is already happening!

In today's world, you can't even say you aren't voting for Mr. Obama without having a visit from the Secret Service. You are branded as stupid, racist, warmongering if you even THINK of disagreeing with the left. That is censorship and the loss of freedom a change planted with seeds of Liberalism and Obama is the charismatic leader that is heralding that change!

We MUST continue to get the word out about Mr Obama's lack of courage, leadership and common sense. His ties to terrorists like William Ayers, a man who once said, "Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home, kill your parents, that's where it's really at" are appalling. A man who doesn't regret bombing the Pentagon and who almost single-handedly launched Barack O-bomb-'s political career.

The major media have already decided who their candidate is! MSNBC host Chris Matthews says Barack Obama makes a "thrill" go up his leg when he hears him speak and NBC runs vulgar ads about John McCain.

P.S. Thanks to our campaign to expose the TRUTH about Mr. Obama and his radical terrorist friend and mentor, THE WORD IS SPREADING. The mainstream media is being forced to finally report on this relationship, because the grassroots across America are demanding it. Clips like this one on YouTube are being uploaded and viewed by hundreds of thousands of people online -- but we MUST get the word out even more in the mainstream media to be able to IMPACT this election"


No comments: